It is with great pleasure I finally settle down and make some bits. I've made my own bits for years, since the mid-1990s, chopping them out of silver sheet and filing to shape. Since then, things have developed a bit. (Pardon the pun.) This picture shows the sheet and a few of my chisels. I got most of these from my Dad, who tinkered with silverworking when he was a young man. (The family story is he was making a concho belt for my mother.)
These days I start my bits with a drawing. This particular bit is for the Goerhing saddle, and the reference only shows that it's got a big rayed concho on the mouthpiece end and looks Mexican. Without much more than that, I searched through several High Noon catalogs. (By the way, the High Noon auction is going on this very weekend! Thanks for all the great reference...) Nothing. The closest I could get was a couple of Jesus Tapia bits; he was a bit and spur maker from the 19th C. By total and complete coincidence (I swear) one of these bits is used on the High Noon home page. We must have the same taste.
The one I wound up leaning on most for my pattern was pleasantly asymmetrical and ornamented with tiny smooth round spots on the tips of branchlike extensions. Nobody else, so far as I know, created such asymmetrical bit shanks. I made my paper pattern, put tape over it and cut it out, then drew around it on my silver sheet. If you look closely at the top picture you can see the bit shank brace bar (bit bar) pattern laid on the big silver piece.
This is where the story gets personal. I took a picture of myself cutting out that bar, but then -- whoop -- it leapt from my hand and completely disappeared. I spent more than an hour looking for it. At more than an inch long, how could it have vanished?! For a radius of 5 feet around I hunted, I turned over, I stormed, I even cried. I hate to admit it. Big name artist getting all steamed up over losing parts... After 34 years, I still drop things.
In the end I made another one. As these things usually go, it was a better one.
This shows the files I use. The braided handles came later, each one individually over the years. The two paper patterns are at upper right.
Much time is taken filing the bit blanks smooth and equal, and drilling and smoothing the holes. There comes a point when I cease matching them up to the paper pattern and just go on by eye. At that point they're individuals, with their own minute flaws and asymmetries. When they're sufficiently smooth and ready for engraving, it's time to break out the Thermo-Loc.
This stuff resembles gray chewing gum. It is a heat-sensitive matrix for engraving itsy bitty teeny weeny pieces -- pieces that are too small to fit in the engraving vise. I've got the smallest vise, but still they are too small for it... Put the Thermo-Loc in the microwave and soften it up, then embed the blanks. It's a skill knowing how deep to push: too deep and you can't reach the edges, too shallow and it won't hold. When it's cool it hardens and you can put it in the vise.
If you're good, you've remembered to place each bit shank with its best side up, one right and one left. :) This shows the engraving process near the beginning. The edges have been rocker-engraved and the floral pattern is just starting to be carved. Yes, I work with a magnifier...
Many people would be satisfied at this stage of the proceedings. I would have been, for many years. The stems at the bottom of the shanks have been curled around into loops. They will accept the bit shank brace, which faces forward.
What could be left to do? For one, doming. For another, don't forget there should be big rayed conchos, like stars. At first I was planning to use some cup-shaped disc blanks I had, but initial engraving revealed them to be silver-plated brass!! and thus not acceptable. So I had to make a couple of conchos myself, and what better than out of the same peice of sheet. Drafting circle template to the rescue: five-eighths inch diameter. My dapping block is another gift from my father.
They were a little thick, but this just gave me an excuse to engrave them deeply. The first engraving pass was satisfactory enough to warrant soldering them to the bit shanks. Although the conchos are pretty thick, they add considerably to the bits' detail and heft. The bits have taken on a nice three-dimensional shape from subtle doming and dapping as well. Notice, too, I solved the problem of the little silver dots in the design.
I did it with tiny bits of solder. Soldering in miniature is an excuse to tear your hair out with frustration, and only years of tackmaking (another excuse) guide me... These dots were the big pioneer development of this particular pair of bit shanks, "never solved before, never tried." I was so jazzed I was running up and down the stairs. It worked it worked!! And think of what I could do in the future...
Next day I reset them in Thermo-Loc and continued work on the conchos. This planed down the thick edges a bit, approaching the original reference.
And we're done.
Saturday, January 26, 2013
Friday, January 11, 2013
3Ms and a Bosal
The 3 Ms stand for K. Moisan's Micro-order Mecate. At this point in my career, I've made a lot of mecates, and the only way to distinguish them is by their owner: the person who ordered them. Most pieces of my tack are referred to by their original owner / orderer. Only a few pieces make it to "name land" and have their own specific moniker. But don't despair: in the course of 2012 I made another piece of tack I labelled HHH (Heli's Hitched Horsehair). Living in the early 21st century makes you an expert in crafting headlines whether you like it or not.
This mecate is part of a micro-order which was started 1211.29 (that's November 29, 2012; you guys're gonna have to get used to my dating system), and finished only yesterday, 1301.10. An earlier picture of it is on my main website. It originally had a red-brown popper. Learning, always learning: the request for a different popper taught me that this area of my mecates, the 'turnover' in the center of the spin (therefore the end of the rope) is not as ignorable as I'd hoped! I used to struggle to braid or spin it; it's less than an inch and you don't see much of it. Then I thought I'd just ignore it. Several mecates later, I see I should just go back to spinning or braiding. At least this one escaped without too much damage...
The order includes a bosal.
As told on my main website, the bosal core (frame) was made in the Safelite Auto Glass foyer in Fayetteville, South Carolina. This merely proves Sue makes tack on vacation -- it's the ultimate portable hobby! The nosebutton foundation was begun while still in Florida. On the way home I reached the nosebutton interweaves, having already done the sidebuttons: they were easier. My recipe for bosals, having been tuned almost 2 dozen times, is reaching a state of stability.
The procedure is simple and organic: start with the nosebutton (end cores, foundation, body, interweaves) and extend to the sidebuttons (ditto); then bend the frame, and tie the core to the heel knot. Then, do the heel knot. Last of all, finish with the end concho. Basically I sweep downwards from top to bottom. The end swells to the nosebutton are the exception to this general order. They're small but must be done first.
When I think of how I used to make bosals with the frame already bent and tied, I get the shudders. Thank you Gail Hought for opening my eyes.
I see I'm using the word 'core' to mean two different things. 'Bosal core (frame)' refers to the wire with braided sinew around it. This core is the tennis-racquet-shaped thingy. 'Core to the heel knot' means the groundwork (in Hought's phrase) or base to a button. Any button that is rounded and sticking out more than its own threads' thickness has got a core. It is inside the button. You might think I'd use the word 'foundation' to refer to this core. Nope! Foundation has a very specific meaning: a braided button (here, a long tube) which forms a framework for later additions of interweaves. Larger and longer buttons are made with more strings, not with the same string added back in... except in models, that is, where you can get away with such a trick.
Oh yeah, I could write a book!
This bosal was a portrait of a real one. It was relatively simple with only 2 colors, rawhide and a contrasting dark brown. Last year I had made 3 bosals, two with multiple (3 or more) colors and one without any (pure rawhide). This one, then, fell between. Just make a straight rawhide one and stick in some dark brown. As it turned out, this one has 6 nosebutton interweaves while my 2012 ones both had 5. Five and six rings are the 'sweet spot' at Traditional scale. Four or fewer and the eye can count them. It looks like deliberate restraint. Five, and the eye cannot count them; an optical illusion occurs, and it looks real (the real ones range from 11 to 15). Over 6 and the math doesn't work for me; it gets even more difficult putting them in -- and it's hard enough as it is!
You can probably tell I'm switching over to telling more and more here, on the blog. The main TSII website will still be home to longer essays and stories. For instance, right now I'm planning to introduce our next saddle there. And, as always, our latest Orders news can be found on our Tack Orders page.
This mecate is part of a micro-order which was started 1211.29 (that's November 29, 2012; you guys're gonna have to get used to my dating system), and finished only yesterday, 1301.10. An earlier picture of it is on my main website. It originally had a red-brown popper. Learning, always learning: the request for a different popper taught me that this area of my mecates, the 'turnover' in the center of the spin (therefore the end of the rope) is not as ignorable as I'd hoped! I used to struggle to braid or spin it; it's less than an inch and you don't see much of it. Then I thought I'd just ignore it. Several mecates later, I see I should just go back to spinning or braiding. At least this one escaped without too much damage...
The order includes a bosal.
As told on my main website, the bosal core (frame) was made in the Safelite Auto Glass foyer in Fayetteville, South Carolina. This merely proves Sue makes tack on vacation -- it's the ultimate portable hobby! The nosebutton foundation was begun while still in Florida. On the way home I reached the nosebutton interweaves, having already done the sidebuttons: they were easier. My recipe for bosals, having been tuned almost 2 dozen times, is reaching a state of stability.
The procedure is simple and organic: start with the nosebutton (end cores, foundation, body, interweaves) and extend to the sidebuttons (ditto); then bend the frame, and tie the core to the heel knot. Then, do the heel knot. Last of all, finish with the end concho. Basically I sweep downwards from top to bottom. The end swells to the nosebutton are the exception to this general order. They're small but must be done first.
When I think of how I used to make bosals with the frame already bent and tied, I get the shudders. Thank you Gail Hought for opening my eyes.
I see I'm using the word 'core' to mean two different things. 'Bosal core (frame)' refers to the wire with braided sinew around it. This core is the tennis-racquet-shaped thingy. 'Core to the heel knot' means the groundwork (in Hought's phrase) or base to a button. Any button that is rounded and sticking out more than its own threads' thickness has got a core. It is inside the button. You might think I'd use the word 'foundation' to refer to this core. Nope! Foundation has a very specific meaning: a braided button (here, a long tube) which forms a framework for later additions of interweaves. Larger and longer buttons are made with more strings, not with the same string added back in... except in models, that is, where you can get away with such a trick.
Oh yeah, I could write a book!
This bosal was a portrait of a real one. It was relatively simple with only 2 colors, rawhide and a contrasting dark brown. Last year I had made 3 bosals, two with multiple (3 or more) colors and one without any (pure rawhide). This one, then, fell between. Just make a straight rawhide one and stick in some dark brown. As it turned out, this one has 6 nosebutton interweaves while my 2012 ones both had 5. Five and six rings are the 'sweet spot' at Traditional scale. Four or fewer and the eye can count them. It looks like deliberate restraint. Five, and the eye cannot count them; an optical illusion occurs, and it looks real (the real ones range from 11 to 15). Over 6 and the math doesn't work for me; it gets even more difficult putting them in -- and it's hard enough as it is!
You can probably tell I'm switching over to telling more and more here, on the blog. The main TSII website will still be home to longer essays and stories. For instance, right now I'm planning to introduce our next saddle there. And, as always, our latest Orders news can be found on our Tack Orders page.
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
Half Appaloosa
Isn't it amazing how old familiar phrases can acquire new meanings. Take the words Half Appaloosa. In our world, one would naturally think it meant a half bred horse: one parent an Appaloosa. But now look at what I've been looking at for the past 3 weeks.
Over Christmas, with more pleasure than I ever thought possible, I have pursued the etching of Rinker. He started out Mudflap Envy, it is true... and every spot on Mudflap is here represented, to the best of my ability. But as my skill grew (though still not anywhere near some I have seen), those Breyer spots began to conflict with my plans more and more. I was surprised by what this horse was telling me. Mudflap Inspiration would be a truer name.
Over and over again, I said to my travelling companion: I have seen thousands upon thousands of model horses; I have photographed hundreds upon hundreds of them. But I've never seen anything like this.
He actually thinks I should leave him as he is now, Half Appaloosa.
Alas, to me that's not an option. But I surely am enjoying his uniqueness at this stage.
Why is there only half a horse? Surely the skill of the etcher, having departed so far from Mudflap, could encompass the other half? Look at that face, that shoulder. Some of the spots of Mudflap are too big and of the wrong orientation for what I am increasingly thinking of as realistic roaning. But I wish to remain true to my original intent, which was to cut a copy of the Lone Star Special Run. And ha-ha ho-ho, the only pictures I've been able to secure of Mudflap have all been of his near side.
ONLY his near side -- !! Even the latest issue of JAH, which has a picture of Mudflap in it -- yes, I blinked!! -- shows only his near side!!
I am particularly proud of the groin area etching. It was done early, before the shoulder. There's no explaining these things. They have wills of their own. It almost looks peacock-inspired, with curls and loops and scales. I am doing all this work with just a half-round knife.
It's the romance side of the horse, in carousel terms.
"Loud" is another word that consistently echoes in my head, whenever I look at this horse. Loud, loud, loud. I didn't really intend quite this level of loud!! But what the heck. He's a dream come true. I probably won't be passing this way again. I have wanted one of these, and he's grown in the making. To make tack for him will be, again, a dream come true.
To all those people who list Mudflap as wanted on MH$P: wouldn't a one of a kind be more fun?
Thanks, Lindy.
Over Christmas, with more pleasure than I ever thought possible, I have pursued the etching of Rinker. He started out Mudflap Envy, it is true... and every spot on Mudflap is here represented, to the best of my ability. But as my skill grew (though still not anywhere near some I have seen), those Breyer spots began to conflict with my plans more and more. I was surprised by what this horse was telling me. Mudflap Inspiration would be a truer name.
Over and over again, I said to my travelling companion: I have seen thousands upon thousands of model horses; I have photographed hundreds upon hundreds of them. But I've never seen anything like this.
He actually thinks I should leave him as he is now, Half Appaloosa.
Alas, to me that's not an option. But I surely am enjoying his uniqueness at this stage.
Why is there only half a horse? Surely the skill of the etcher, having departed so far from Mudflap, could encompass the other half? Look at that face, that shoulder. Some of the spots of Mudflap are too big and of the wrong orientation for what I am increasingly thinking of as realistic roaning. But I wish to remain true to my original intent, which was to cut a copy of the Lone Star Special Run. And ha-ha ho-ho, the only pictures I've been able to secure of Mudflap have all been of his near side.
ONLY his near side -- !! Even the latest issue of JAH, which has a picture of Mudflap in it -- yes, I blinked!! -- shows only his near side!!
I am particularly proud of the groin area etching. It was done early, before the shoulder. There's no explaining these things. They have wills of their own. It almost looks peacock-inspired, with curls and loops and scales. I am doing all this work with just a half-round knife.
It's the romance side of the horse, in carousel terms.
"Loud" is another word that consistently echoes in my head, whenever I look at this horse. Loud, loud, loud. I didn't really intend quite this level of loud!! But what the heck. He's a dream come true. I probably won't be passing this way again. I have wanted one of these, and he's grown in the making. To make tack for him will be, again, a dream come true.
To all those people who list Mudflap as wanted on MH$P: wouldn't a one of a kind be more fun?
Thanks, Lindy.
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
A foal halter
This is a Warmblood Foal Show Halter, based on a real halter seen on Coopermill Harness. The piece is a trade for a Toby POA (proving that Sue can be bought, at least on a good day!). It is neither Western nor braidwork, but I completely enjoyed it. Thanks go to M. Lineman, owner.
The "chain" of the browband was created with hot-fix iron-on spots. I used the smallest size and cut them into rough squares. They taught me something I already knew: the gun has to be HOT before fixing works properly.
This might be a good time to point out how I make the holes on such a small scale piece of tack (or any model tack!). A great deal of trouble and expertise is spent on trying to make circular holes; see Jennifer Buxton's blog. I hope I mention often enough how indebted I am to CAROL WILLIAMS who gave me the idea to use slits instead of holes. Once I switched to slits, cutting them with a custom-built needle chisel, I had no problems. Slits are far less stressful on the leather and much more in scale. Moisten the lace, run a needle through to widen the hole and let it dry -- presto.
The buckles and rings are all made from goldplated wire. The brow conchos were made from Dolls-house Christmas Tree brass ornaments. I've had these hanging around forever -- Clare Bell Brass Works??!? -- ever since I was in my Draft Harness heydays in the 1980s. The solid one was perfect for the job since the Rio Rondo harness brasses I usually use were too big. Yes, even the Classic ones!
The noseband stitching is a test of an idea I've had for a long time. It is painted, yes, but also sunk in. Lines were cut on the leather, then paint applied and wiped off -- it stayed only deep in the cuts. The natural grain and roughness of the leather, interrupting the smoothness of the lines, makes it appear there are 'stitches.' This is a good example of model tack as the art of optical illusion.
The "chain" of the browband was created with hot-fix iron-on spots. I used the smallest size and cut them into rough squares. They taught me something I already knew: the gun has to be HOT before fixing works properly.
This might be a good time to point out how I make the holes on such a small scale piece of tack (or any model tack!). A great deal of trouble and expertise is spent on trying to make circular holes; see Jennifer Buxton's blog. I hope I mention often enough how indebted I am to CAROL WILLIAMS who gave me the idea to use slits instead of holes. Once I switched to slits, cutting them with a custom-built needle chisel, I had no problems. Slits are far less stressful on the leather and much more in scale. Moisten the lace, run a needle through to widen the hole and let it dry -- presto.
The buckles and rings are all made from goldplated wire. The brow conchos were made from Dolls-house Christmas Tree brass ornaments. I've had these hanging around forever -- Clare Bell Brass Works??!? -- ever since I was in my Draft Harness heydays in the 1980s. The solid one was perfect for the job since the Rio Rondo harness brasses I usually use were too big. Yes, even the Classic ones!
The noseband stitching is a test of an idea I've had for a long time. It is painted, yes, but also sunk in. Lines were cut on the leather, then paint applied and wiped off -- it stayed only deep in the cuts. The natural grain and roughness of the leather, interrupting the smoothness of the lines, makes it appear there are 'stitches.' This is a good example of model tack as the art of optical illusion.
My Peery saddle
[From the Sneak Peeks page, Dated November 6] Every now and then I'm lucky enough to splurge. I've been looking for a Brooke Peery western saddle for years. Brooke is yet another example of a very talented tack artist who takes the field by storm for a few years and then quietly vanishes, leaving collectors to scramble. She first appeared somewhere around 2005. The date on this beauty is 2007.
The usual stretch for such an artist is three years. Brooke may have lasted a little longer, but not much; by 2009 I couldn't find her. Her website, brookepeery.tripod.com, shows pictures of the 2006 NAN and mentions she has been making tack "for about 3 years now." This would push the opening date back a couple years, to 2003, but bring the close forward as well -- there are no updates after 2006. I think it's fair to state that the glory years were centered around 2005-2007. Like I said, I got lucky.
I have Ashley G. to thank for the chance to acquire this lovely piece. It appears to be freehand tooled. The silver is thin aluminum sheet (not tape) hand cut and embossed. The spots are all pin heads: trust me, that's the hard way. Yes, the fenders don't swing (more obvious in the above picture) but the overall detail is awesome.
The blanket is my own work (Blue Catalina) done from a pattern of Chris Armstrong's with different colors. The bridle is my own Tissarn's Mech Hack, up because Jenn Buxton's Hack is based on it [at the time posted on braymere blog] and because the greens were a better match to the turquoise blanket than her dark red. I would also like to crow about the blue sky. This was the first blue sky I'd really seen since Sandy the Superstorm, i.e. in about a week!!
And of course the horse is Carol Williams' incomparable Matriarch, painted by Katie Richards and given me by that earthbound angel, Sue Peet. I named her LaJewel, which is a real person's name which I saw in a magazine.
The usual stretch for such an artist is three years. Brooke may have lasted a little longer, but not much; by 2009 I couldn't find her. Her website, brookepeery.tripod.com, shows pictures of the 2006 NAN and mentions she has been making tack "for about 3 years now." This would push the opening date back a couple years, to 2003, but bring the close forward as well -- there are no updates after 2006. I think it's fair to state that the glory years were centered around 2005-2007. Like I said, I got lucky.
I have Ashley G. to thank for the chance to acquire this lovely piece. It appears to be freehand tooled. The silver is thin aluminum sheet (not tape) hand cut and embossed. The spots are all pin heads: trust me, that's the hard way. Yes, the fenders don't swing (more obvious in the above picture) but the overall detail is awesome.
The blanket is my own work (Blue Catalina) done from a pattern of Chris Armstrong's with different colors. The bridle is my own Tissarn's Mech Hack, up because Jenn Buxton's Hack is based on it [at the time posted on braymere blog] and because the greens were a better match to the turquoise blanket than her dark red. I would also like to crow about the blue sky. This was the first blue sky I'd really seen since Sandy the Superstorm, i.e. in about a week!!
And of course the horse is Carol Williams' incomparable Matriarch, painted by Katie Richards and given me by that earthbound angel, Sue Peet. I named her LaJewel, which is a real person's name which I saw in a magazine.
Saturday, December 8, 2012
Micro order mecate in the pipeline
This is a sneak preview of K M's micro order mecate. On this one I am trying to accomplish a true 6-part mecate, with 6 strands showing, and a 7th strand forming the core. Previously this was not possible for me. Up to this point I had used 6 strands for a mecate, the 6th forming a core and thus not seen; each strand used 3 or 4 threads depending on color. The checkered (fleck) strands used 4, since they had to be divisible by 2. I felt that 7 times 3 threads would be too bulky for Trad scale. Plus it was just dern hard to make these things -- another strand would make it just that much harder. So I thought....
![]() |
| Real horsehair mecate, "Wendy's" from Hagel's Mecate Gallery |
This is a picture of the mecate the customer sent me, to craft a miniature portrait of. Isn't it pretty?! It seemed such a shame to eliminate even one color from the 6. If I had to I was planning to dump one of the browns... Then, during the forming of the strands, I was hit by an idea. Instead of 3 Topstitching [currently sold as Heavy] weight threads, try using 2 Topst. + 2 HQ [Hand Quilting, the smallest guage I currently use]. Spin the 2 as normal, then, one by one, add in the HQs. Since they are fed through the popper (quirt) and folded over in the middle, there are two anyway. To my amazement, it worked. Since 1 Topst. = 3 HQs, this was a savings of 1 HQ. It might not seem like a lot, but multiplied over the 6 or 7 strands, it added up.
This is what a TSII mecate looks like under construction. The horse is Kilbourn's Maxixe, because he was my closest resin in size to the requested one. The anchor is tied to the board in back, so I can't pull it off the bench. There is a lot of pulling... The clips hold the various strands and keep them from unraveling. Spinning progresses a few inches at a time.
It's very difficult to maintain a constant tension on the spin. I find I can make only 2 inches or so at a time. For this particular mecate, the black and check strands are fitted last and separately. This leaves brown + brown as a pair and white + white as a pair. (It could just as easily have been brown + white and brown + white.) Each pair is spun a few inches as tightly as possible (but they always work loose; this turns out to be needed). While they're tight, they are spun together into a 4 around the core. The core was the real brainwave of this mecate and the secret to a 7-strand. It is a single, not a double (doubled-over) strand, and was hung from the popper by itself. The trick to mecates is to start at the popper, since in real life this end is doubled over on itself too. This makes tying the tassel button core, at the other end, possible; you have ends to work with.
It's very difficult to maintain a constant tension on the spin. I find I can make only 2 inches or so at a time. For this particular mecate, the black and check strands are fitted last and separately. This leaves brown + brown as a pair and white + white as a pair. (It could just as easily have been brown + white and brown + white.) Each pair is spun a few inches as tightly as possible (but they always work loose; this turns out to be needed). While they're tight, they are spun together into a 4 around the core. The core was the real brainwave of this mecate and the secret to a 7-strand. It is a single, not a double (doubled-over) strand, and was hung from the popper by itself. The trick to mecates is to start at the popper, since in real life this end is doubled over on itself too. This makes tying the tassel button core, at the other end, possible; you have ends to work with.
Etching my own
| Taken on the back deck November 23, 2012. |
His name is Rinker, after a type of pleasure boat.
![]() |
| Breyer's Mudflap photographed at NAN 2012 by SBY |
I had previously etched 4 horses: a Lonesome Glory, a Classic New QH Mare, a Stone Pony, and a Roxy. (Deep in the past was a bay pinto Standing Stock Foal.) Once the idea seized hold, I purchased a Smart Chic Olena for a nominal price. "He was already scratched." Next, I printed out 4 pictures of Mudflap, all I could find on the Web. As of this writing I don't have pictures of his off side. However, I do have a friend nearby who owns this model, and has promised picture-taking privileges. Thanks Margaret! This left only the time-management problem.
| Taken December 7 2012 by SBY |
I am not aiming for etched perfection, the likes of Billie Campbell or Liz Shaw. I'm not even aiming for realism. And, strange to say, I'm not aiming for Mudflap, not anymore. All Mudflap's spots are there, but others appeared. It's too fun to let him dictate himself where the spots will be. I can always remove some; I can't put them back. After the first rough X-Acto passes, I use rubbing alcohol to smoothe and clean up the white parts. This weak acid works wonders, being so much more gentle than acetone. It's about as weak as vinegar, which will also do the same job.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

























